Professional Standards for Administrative Management

Legal Notice

© 2026 Institute of Administrative Management. All rights reserved. This document is published for public reference. It may be cited, quoted, and reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial professional, educational, and research purposes, provided that the Institute of Administrative Management is clearly acknowledged as the source and the document reference (IAM-PS-2026-001) is given. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes, or any modification of the text, requires the prior written permission of the Institute of Administrative Management.

This document establishes professional standards for Institute of Administrative Management (IAM) Professional Members, Affiliates, and Student Members. It does not constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. The Institute of Administrative Management, its officers, employees, and agents accept no liability for any loss, damage, or claim arising from the use of or reliance upon the content of this document. Professional Members and other users are advised to seek independent legal or professional counsel regarding matters of employment law, data protection, health and safety, or regulatory compliance as relevant to their specific organisation and jurisdiction.

These Standards are principle-based and jurisdiction-neutral. Where the Standards refer to legal, regulatory, or compliance obligations, they do so in general terms. Professional Members are responsible for identifying the specific laws, regulations, and standards that apply to their own role and jurisdiction, and for keeping their knowledge of those requirements up to date. Specific legislation, statutory instruments, and regulatory commencement dates are deliberately not cited in these Standards; current legal information is provided through the IAM’s separate guidance notes, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) courses, and jurisdiction-specific supplementary materials, which are updated more frequently than the Standards themselves.

Accessibility: The Institute is committed to publishing these Standards accessibly. The electronic edition is prepared to meet internationally recognised digital accessibility standards, and the document is available in alternative formats on request to enquiry@instam.org.

Consultation notice. This document is an Exposure Draft published for consultation. It is complete and has been approved for consultation by the IAM Professional Standards Committee, but it is not yet in effect and may change before the First Edition is confirmed. Comments are invited by 16 October 2026 (17:00 UK time) through the online response form at www.instam.org/standards/respond, or by email to enquiry@instam.org with the subject line “Professional Standards Exposure Draft”. The First Edition is due to be published on 30 November 2026 and to take effect on 1 January 2027.

Comment is welcome on any part of the document. The Committee particularly invites views on: the seven Competency Domains and whether any area of professional practice is missing or over-weighted; the extended treatment of financial governance, control, and commercial finance in Domain 5; the Career Stage descriptors in Section 6 and the Progression Matrix in Section 7; the competence descriptions by Domain and Stage at Annex A, which are intended to guide both applicants and employers describing a role; and the international applicability provisions at Section 2.4.

Language: These Standards are published in English. The English text is the authoritative text. Where the Institute issues a translation, it is provided for convenience only and the English text prevails in the event of any difference of meaning.

Recommended citation: Institute of Administrative Management (2026), IAM Professional Standards for Administrative Management, Edition 1.0, IAM-PS-2026-001, available at www.instam.org.

Document Control

Edition History

PART A: THE PROFESSION

1. Introduction

The Institute of Administrative Management has set standards for professional practice in administrative management since 1915. This document (the IAM Professional Standards for Administrative Management) describes what it means to practise administrative management to a professional standard, from those entering the profession for the first time to the most senior strategic leaders. Modern administrative management is a broad discipline: it remains rooted in the administrative tradition, but it now extends across much of general business management and administration, and these Standards are written for administrative and business management professionals alike.

The Standards are the reference against which the IAM’s Certified Programmes are designed, CPD requirements are structured, Professional Membership grades are assessed, and digital credentials are awarded. They are also intended for use by employers, educators, and the public, who may rely on them to understand the competence that IAM credentials represent.

The document is organised in six parts, followed by two informative annexes. Part A sets out the purpose and scope of the Standards together with the IAM’s nine Professional Values and the profession’s commitment to the public interest. Part B describes the seven Competency Domains that define the breadth of the profession. Part C sets out the four assessed Career Stages, the workforce-level recognition tier of Affiliate, and the Progression Matrix that aligns Competency Domain to Career Stage. Part D addresses professional conduct and ethics. Part E describes how the Standards are applied by individuals, employers, and educators. Part F covers governance, review, and the schedule of related IAM documents.

The Institute’s motto, Non Sibi Sed Toti: Not for Oneself but for All, reminds Professional Members that the Standards exist to benefit those served by the profession.

2. Purpose and Scope

2.1 Purpose of the Professional Standards

The IAM Professional Standards for Administrative Management define the knowledge, skills, professional behaviours, and ethical commitments expected of administrative and business management professionals at every stage of their career. They provide a common language of professional competence used across the Institute’s professional framework and recognised by employers, educators, and professional communities internationally.

These Standards are the Institute’s benchmark for administrative and business management professionals, and they guide Certified Programme design, CPD frameworks, and Professional Membership assessment. A full schedule of related IAM governance and framework documents is set out in Section 14.

2.2 The Administrative Management Profession

Administrative management is the professional discipline concerned with the design, delivery, governance, and continuous improvement of the systems, processes, technologies, and services that enable organisations to function effectively. It encompasses the management of information, communication, resources, people, and compliance within and across organisational boundaries.

As the discipline has matured, the boundary between administrative management and general business management has narrowed. Administrative management, as the Institute understands it today, reaches well beyond office administration to encompass the wider practice of business management and administration: the planning, coordination, and oversight of the functions, resources, budgets, and people through which organisations operate. In practice, that means coordinating budgets, overseeing compliance, deploying technology, managing facilities, leading people, and translating executive strategy into day-to-day operations. These Standards therefore serve both administrative management professionals and those working in broader business management and administration roles, without setting aside the heritage from which the profession takes its name.

Administrative management professionals are responsible for designing, delivering, and improving the systems and infrastructure that support every part of an organisation. This includes the systems that manage information and communication, the processes that maintain governance and compliance, and the teams that deliver day-to-day operational services. At senior levels, administrative management professionals contribute to organisational strategy, lead change and transformation, and connect the organisation’s strategic intentions with its day-to-day operations.

The profession spans a wide range of roles and specialisms, from executive assistants, personal assistants, virtual assistants, and office managers to business managers, operations directors, and chief administrative officers, across every sector of the economy and in organisations of every size. The seven Competency Domains set out in these Standards reflect this breadth. These roles are unified by a shared body of professional knowledge, a common set of professional skills and behaviours, and a commitment to the ethical values that define the profession.

2.3 The Institute of Administrative Management and Professional Membership

Founded in the United Kingdom in 1915, the Institute of Administrative Management is one of the world’s longest-established professional bodies for administrative and business management. With Professional Members in many countries, the IAM sets standards for administrative and business management practice, provides professional development pathways, and advocates for the profession internationally. Where applicable in the practitioner’s jurisdiction, IAM membership subscriptions may qualify for tax relief, exemption, or deduction available to subscriptions paid to recognised professional bodies. Members are advised to consult their local tax authority or a qualified tax adviser for guidance on their personal position.

Distinction between Statutory Membership and Professional Membership

The Institute is a company limited by guarantee, governed by its Articles of Association. The Articles establish a category of statutory company members who hold voting rights at general meetings of the Company and who guarantee a nominal sum in the event of the Company being wound up. Statutory company membership is entirely distinct from Professional Membership as described in these Standards.

Professional Membership is a subscription-based professional relationship established by the Board of Directors under its rule-making power in the Articles of Association, and is governed by the IAM Membership Regulation (IAM-MEM-REG-2026-001). Professional Members are not members of the Company in a statutory sense, do not hold voting rights at general meetings, and are not subject to the Articles’ provisions governing statutory company membership. Where these Standards refer to “Professional Members” or simply “members”, the reference is to Professional Members as defined by the IAM Membership Regulation, not to statutory company members.

2.4 International Applicability

These Standards are designed for international application. The competency expectations expressed in the seven domains are principle-based and applicable across all jurisdictions; they contain no requirement that is specific to any single country, legal system, or regulator. Where the Standards refer to legal, regulatory, or compliance obligations, they do so in general terms and without naming specific statutes or regulations. Professional Members are responsible for identifying the laws, regulations, and standards that apply to their own role and jurisdiction. No Competency Domain, Career Stage descriptor, or cell of the Progression Matrix requires knowledge of the law of any particular country. Where the Standards expect legal or regulatory knowledge, they expect it of the law that applies to the practitioner’s own jurisdiction and sector, whatever that law may be, and competence is assessed on that basis. The international standards and frameworks listed at Annex B are cited undated and for information only; they are not requirements of these Standards. The IAM provides jurisdiction-specific supplementary guidance and CPD materials to support Professional Members in applying the Standards in their national and sectoral context.

2.5 Who Should Use These Standards

These Standards are intended for four primary audiences. Professional Members use them for self-assessment, CPD planning, and career development. Employers use them for job design, recruitment, performance management, and workforce planning. Educators and centre partners use them as the foundation for course and qualification design, assessment, and quality assurance. The public and regulators may use them to understand the competence that IAM credentials represent.

The Standards apply to the whole span of the discipline described at Section 2.2, from administrative and business support roles through office and administration management to executive and private office practice, governance and board support, records and information administration, project and operations management, and the leadership of administrative and corporate services at organisational level. They are written for the generalist, cross-functional manager in every sector and in organisations of every size, and are not confined to any single job title, sector, or country. The IAM Role Mastery Series Framework (IAM-RMS-2026-001) maintains, at its Role Title Register, a controlled vocabulary of the job titles used for these roles across regions; a role is assessed on its substance and responsibilities, never on its title.

2.6 Scope and Limitations

These Standards set professional expectations for the practice of administrative and business management. They are not legal or regulatory requirements and do not override the law of the jurisdiction in which a member practises.

The Standards describe the generalist, cross-functional management of organisations: the planning, coordination, leadership, and oversight of the systems, processes, resources, budgets, and people through which organisations operate, as set out in the seven Competency Domains. They address this dimension of business management and administration and do not extend to the specialist commercial disciplines, such as marketing and sales, which fall outside their scope.

The Standards do not qualify, regulate, or replace the specialist and regulated professions that maintain their own qualifications and professional bodies, such as law, accountancy and audit, the clinical professions, engineering, human resources, procurement, and project management. Where a member of such a profession also holds administrative or management responsibilities, these Standards apply to that part of their role, while the standards of their own profession continue to govern their specialist practice. The Competency Domains include working knowledge of areas such as finance, procurement, people management, and project coordination at the level expected of a generalist manager, including the ability to work effectively with, and to know when to call on, the relevant specialists. This generalist competence complements, and does not confer or substitute for, qualification in the corresponding specialist professions.

2.7 Definitions

The following definitions apply throughout this document. Other terms are introduced and defined inline at first use.

Table 1. Defined terms

3. Professional Purpose and Values

3.1 The Purpose of the Administrative Management Profession

The core purpose of the profession is to support organisational effectiveness through the management of systems, processes, and resources. Administrative management professionals design the workflows, manage the physical and digital working environments, govern resources, and foster the workplace culture that allow strategy to be carried out and people to work safely, productively, collaboratively, and ethically.

IAM’s mission: To provide professional development pathways, advocate for the administrative management profession, support career advancement, deliver up-to-date industry knowledge, and promote lifelong learning.

IAM’s vision: To be the leading global body for administrative management, recognised for advancing the profession and for supporting administrative professionals at every stage of their careers, from first role to strategic leadership.

3.2 The IAM’s Professional Values

The following nine Professional Values define the ethical foundation of professional practice in administrative management. They are expressed as nine binding Principles in the IAM Code of Ethics (IAM-COE-2026-001) and apply to all Professional Members, Affiliates, Student Members, and Honorary Fellows. Together they form the basis of the IAM’s disciplinary framework. The Values are deliberately granular: because each is a separately binding and separately enforceable Principle of the Code, related concepts such as Integrity, Professional Behaviour, and Accountability are stated individually rather than merged.

Table 2. The IAM’s nine Professional Values

3.3 The Profession and the Public Interest

The work of administrative management professionals reaches well beyond their employers. The records they keep, the data they protect, the procurement they oversee, the working environments they manage, and the governance they support all bear on the safety, wellbeing, and financial interests of colleagues, customers, suppliers, regulators, and the wider public. These Standards therefore serve the public interest as well as the profession. They give the public and regulators a clear statement of the competence and conduct that IAM credentials represent, and they commit Professional Members to act with integrity even where the public interest and short-term organisational interest pull in different directions. This commitment is reflected in the Institute’s motto, Non Sibi Sed Toti, and is set out in full in the IAM Public Interest Statement (IAM-PIS-2026-001).

PART B: THE SEVEN COMPETENCY DOMAINS

4. Introduction to the Competency Domains

4.1 How the Domains Are Structured

Each Competency Domain covers a distinct area of professional competence. For each domain, the Standards set out what professionals should know, what they should be able to do, and how they should conduct themselves, described under three headings: Knowledge, Skills, and Professional Behaviours. The ethical commitments set out in Section 3 and Part D apply across all domains and are reflected in the professional behaviours expectations throughout. These three categories are then differentiated across Career Stages in Part C. Within each domain, the Knowledge, Skills, and Professional Behaviours are labelled K, S, and B and numbered, so that any statement can be cited precisely by domain and label, for example Domain 3, Knowledge 4 (D3-K4) or Domain 5, Skill 2 (D5-S2), in job descriptions, course mappings, CPD records, and descriptions of professional experience. The same convention is used throughout the IAM Certified Programme specifications and the Role Mastery Series.

The seven domains are designed to cover the full breadth of the profession. Every administrative management professional should demonstrate competence across all seven domains, though the depth and emphasis will vary according to their role, specialism, and Career Stage.

Each domain is expressed within a standard range: six to eight knowledge statements, six to eight skill statements, and three to four professional behaviours. The range keeps the domains comparable in weight and keeps the Standards a usable length. It is a drafting convention, not a statement that the domains are of equal importance; the relative weight given to each domain in any particular role is a matter for the employer and the practitioner, as Section 11 explains.

4.2 The Seven Domains at a Glance

Table 3. The seven Competency Domains and their scope

5. Seven Competency Domains in Detail

The following sections describe each of the seven Competency Domains. For each domain, the Standards set out what the domain covers and why it matters, followed by the knowledge, skills, and professional behaviours expected at a general level. The ethical commitments described in Section 3 apply throughout. Annex B lists, for information, the international standards and frameworks most relevant to each domain.

5.1 Domain 1: Administrative Operations and Office Management

Domain Purpose

Administrative operations form the core of what distinguishes the administrative management profession. Designing, running, and improving the administrative systems and working environments on which an organisation depends is central to every administrative management role. No other area of competence so clearly defines the profession’s contribution.

Knowledge

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should know and understand:

Skills

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should be able to:

Professional Behaviours

Administrative management professionals working within this domain are expected to:

Related IAM guidance: IAM Sustainability and ESG Guidance (IAM-SUS-2026-001), for sustainable procurement and green office practice.

5.2 Domain 2: Communication and Stakeholder Engagement

Domain Purpose

Administrative management runs on communication. Professionals draft, coordinate, filter, and facilitate the flow of information across every level and channel of their organisations. Their effectiveness depends heavily on the stakeholder relationships they build, both inside and outside the organisation.

Knowledge

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should know and understand:

Skills

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should be able to:

Professional Behaviours

Administrative management professionals working within this domain are expected to:

5.3 Domain 3: Digital Proficiency, Technology and Data

Domain Purpose

Digital tools, platforms, and data capabilities have transformed the profession. The administrative management professional’s role has moved beyond using technology to choosing, implementing, and governing it within the organisation. Responsible adoption and oversight of artificial intelligence is a growing part of that work.

Knowledge

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should know and understand:

Skills

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should be able to:

Professional Behaviours

Administrative management professionals working within this domain are expected to:

Related IAM guidance: IAM AI Governance Guidance (IAM-AIG-2026-001).

5.4 Domain 4: People Development, Leadership and Teamwork

Domain Purpose

Most administrative management roles involve people: coordinating them, supervising them, or leading them. At senior levels the profession also shapes organisational culture and talent strategy.

Knowledge

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should know and understand:

Skills

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should be able to:

Professional Behaviours

Administrative management professionals working within this domain are expected to:

Related IAM guidance: IAM EDI Practice Guidance (IAM-EDI-2026-001); IAM Mentoring and Professional Supervision Framework (IAM-MEN-2026-001); IAM Prevention of Harassment Policy (IAM-PHP-2026-001).

5.5 Domain 5: Financial Acumen and Resource Management

Domain Purpose

Administrative management professionals manage budgets, control costs, operate the financial controls on which an organisation depends, and are often asked to demonstrate the value of the functions they run. That work demands sound financial literacy, a working command of financial control and governance, and careful stewardship of resources. The domain is closely connected to the Sustainability Value: procurement and resource allocation decisions are the main means by which administrative managers influence an organisation’s environmental and social footprint.

Knowledge

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should know and understand:

Skills

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should be able to:

Professional Behaviours

Administrative management professionals working within this domain are expected to:

Related IAM guidance: IAM Sustainability and ESG Guidance (IAM-SUS-2026-001).

5.6 Domain 6: Governance, Risk and Organisational Compliance

Domain Purpose

An organisation’s integrity rests in large part on its governance and compliance arrangements, and administrative management professionals are often their first line of defence: they hold the policies, run the compliance processes, and spot the risks early. The domain covers regulatory compliance, data protection, records governance, health and safety, corporate governance, and, increasingly, ESG strategy and sustainability reporting.

Knowledge

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should know and understand:

Skills

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should be able to:

Professional Behaviours

Administrative management professionals working within this domain are expected to:

Related IAM guidance: IAM Sustainability and ESG Guidance (IAM-SUS-2026-001); IAM AI Governance Guidance (IAM-AIG-2026-001).

5.7 Domain 7: Strategy, Innovation and Professional Advocacy

Domain Purpose

What sets senior administrative management professionals apart is the ability to think strategically and ahead of events. At the highest levels, that ability underpins the thought leadership and sector influence expected of Fellows and Senior Fellows. Advocacy for the profession sits in this domain because shaping the profession’s future is itself strategic work: those who lead strategy for their organisations also carry a responsibility to advance the discipline.

Knowledge

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should know and understand:

Skills

Administrative management professionals working within this domain should be able to:

Professional Behaviours

Administrative management professionals working within this domain are expected to:

Related IAM guidance: IAM Mentoring and Professional Supervision Framework (IAM-MEN-2026-001); IAM Public Interest Statement (IAM-PIS-2026-001).

PART C: CAREER STAGES AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRESSION

6. The Career Stages

6.1 How Career Stages Work

The Career Stages describe progressively greater depth of knowledge, breadth of skill, maturity of ethical judgement, and scope of professional responsibility. They are not tied exclusively to job titles or years of experience, but to demonstrated professional competence as defined by these Standards.

The IAM grade architecture has four assessed Career Stages (Practitioner, Professional, Strategic Professional, and Strategic Leader) together with the workforce-level recognition tier of Affiliate. Each assessed Stage aligns to a Professional Membership grade and an IAM Certified Programme. Affiliate sits below the assessed framework as the destination grade for the wider administrative workforce. Detailed admission criteria for each Professional Membership grade are set out in Regulation 3 of the IAM Membership Regulation (IAM-MEM-REG-2026-001), which establishes the three parallel admission routes (the Certified Programme route, the Recognition of Prior Learning route, and the Experience-Assessed route) and specifies the evidence required on each. Admission is determined by the Institute on the evidence supplied by the applicant and verified by the Institute. As a general guide, the intellectual demand of the four Stages corresponds to internationally recognisable levels of higher learning: Stage 1 to higher technical or early undergraduate study, Stage 2 to a completed first degree, Stage 3 to postgraduate study, and Stage 4 to advanced postgraduate or executive level. These comparisons are indicative only, are expressed generically, do not confer academic credit, and are not tied to the qualifications framework of any single country. Qualifying experience, where the Membership Regulation requires it, is likewise assessed on the substance and scope of the work performed and not on the sector, organisation type, or country in which it was performed.

Table 4. IAM grade architecture: workforce-level tier and assessed Career Stages

6.2 Workforce-Level Recognition (Affiliate)

Affiliate is the destination grade for the wider administrative workforce: individuals working in administrative roles whose contribution to the profession is recognised by the Institute without requiring the formal competency assessment of the assessed Career Stages. Affiliate is not preparatory or transitional; it is a recognised membership tier in its own right, intended for those whose career is in administrative work but who are not seeking the assessed designations of Associate, Member, Fellow, or Senior Fellow. The Institute takes this approach deliberately. In many professional bodies an affiliate grade is an entry rung toward assessed membership. The IAM instead recognises that much of the administrative workforce seeks professional belonging and a shared ethical commitment without formal assessment, and values that contribution in its own right.

Typical roles at this tier include receptionists and front-of-house staff, administrative assistants, team and departmental coordinators, records and data administrators, scheduling coordinators, facilities and mailroom assistants, and general administrative support staff; the examples are illustrative, not exhaustive. Those at this tier carry out defined tasks within established procedures, work under direction, and contribute directly to the day-to-day administrative operations of their organisations.

Affiliate membership is open-access. No formal qualifications, prior experience, or assessment are required. Affiliates do not hold a post-nominal designation, but may use the descriptive title “IAM Affiliate”. Affiliates are bound by the IAM Code of Ethics and may be subject to disciplinary action for breach of its provisions. Affiliates are not subject to mandatory CPD requirements, although voluntary professional development is encouraged.

The IAM Essentials Foundation Programme is available to Affiliates as an optional pathway. It may be taken as preparation for upgrade to Associate (AInstAM), where the Affiliate wishes to progress to the assessed framework, or as continuing development for Affiliates who wish to deepen their competence without seeking grade progression. Completion of the IAM Essentials Foundation Programme does not in itself confer Associate grade, which requires admission under Regulation 3 of the IAM Membership Regulation.

6.3 Stage 1: Practitioner

Membership alignment: Associate (AInstAM). Programme: IAM Practitioner Certified Programme.

A Practitioner has established competence and works with increasing independence, handling complex and non-routine tasks and exercising professional judgement. They take ownership of work in their own area from initiation to completion, manage their own workload, and communicate effectively with a wide range of stakeholders. They contribute to team objectives and deal with problems as they emerge. Typical roles include office coordinator, executive assistant, administrative officer, project administrator, governance support officer, facilities coordinator, and finance or human resources administrator. CPD at this Stage should focus on strengthening professional practice, particularly process improvement, stakeholder engagement, and effective teamwork.

6.4 Stage 2: Professional

Membership alignment: Member (MInstAM). Programme: IAM Professional Certified Programme.

A Professional leads administrative functions, manages teams, and takes responsibility for the performance and development of others. They operate at a level where their decisions affect departmental or organisational outcomes. That calls for the ability to analyse complex situations, balance competing priorities, and make judgements informed by both professional knowledge and organisational context. Typical roles include office manager, senior executive assistant, operations manager, business support manager, governance manager, facilities manager, departmental administrator, and programme coordinator. A Professional combines operational expertise with leadership capability. They are expected to show visible commitment to the IAM’s Professional Values and to treat the development of their team members as a priority.

6.5 Stage 3: Strategic Professional

Membership alignment: Fellow (FInstAM). Programme: IAM Strategic Professional Certified Programme.

A Strategic Professional leads administrative operations across a function or significant business unit. They are responsible for the operating model, governance, and performance of their area. Within their function they exercise substantial autonomy over policy and resource decisions, and their influence runs across teams and functions. They mentor practitioners at earlier Career Stages and contribute to the broader administrative management community. Typical roles include head of administration, head of operations, head of governance, senior office manager in large organisations, business operations manager, senior business partner, and regional administration manager. At this Stage, the practitioner is recognised as a leader of the administrative function and a senior voice for the discipline within the organisation. The Strategic Professional stage recognises strategic practice within a function; organisation-wide strategic leadership is reserved for Stage 4.

6.6 Stage 4: Strategic Leader

Membership alignment: Senior Fellow (SFInstAM). Programme: IAM Strategic Leader Certified Programme.

A Strategic Leader operates at the highest assessed level within the administrative management profession. They shape organisational strategy, lead complex transformation programmes, engage at board level, and exercise broad autonomy and judgement across substantial areas of responsibility. Their influence extends beyond their own organisation: they contribute to the profession by mentoring Fellows, shaping sector perspectives, and taking an active part in the IAM’s governance and development activities. Typical roles include director of administration, director of operations, chief administrative officer, chief of staff to the chief executive of a large organisation, chief operations officer, group head of administration, and sector-level thought leader. Strategic Leaders set the ethical tone for the profession through the visible example of their own conduct. Senior Fellow is deliberately an assessed grade rather than an honour. It recognises demonstrated strategic leadership at organisational or cross-organisational scope, and is distinct both from Fellow, which recognises strategic professional practice within a function, and from Honorary Fellow, which is conferred by nomination.

Admission to Senior Fellow is by one of three parallel routes: the Certified Programme route, through completion of the IAM Strategic Leader Certified Programme; the Recognition of Prior Learning route, through assessment of prior certificated learning together with apex-level experience; or the Experience-Assessed route. All three routes require substantial senior-management experience including time at board or apex-equivalent level. In every route the Institute assesses the evidence supplied against the Stage 4 descriptors of the Progression Matrix, looking for sustained strategic leadership at organisational or cross-organisational scope, demonstrable organisational impact, and a consistent record of professional and ethical conduct. Full provisions, including the evidence required and the period within which a decision is made, are set out in the IAM Membership Regulation.

7. The Progression Matrix

The Progression Matrix is the central reference tool for the Professional Standards. It provides a concise summary of the expected competence at each intersection of Competency Domain and assessed Career Stage. Professional Members, employers, and educators should use this matrix for self-assessment, CPD planning, job design, and course development. The matrix covers the four assessed Career Stages (Stage 1 to Stage 4). Workforce-level practitioners at Affiliate tier are not assessed against the matrix; the standards expected at that tier are described in narrative form in Section 6.2.

The matrix should be read in conjunction with the full domain descriptions in Part B and the Career Stage narratives in Section 6. Each cell describes the competence expected at that Stage in that domain and encompasses the knowledge, skills, and professional behaviours set out for the domain in Part B; nothing in Part B is dropped from the matrix. The Stages are cumulative: competence described at an earlier Stage is assumed and carried forward at every later Stage.

The verbs used in the matrix are calibrated to the four Stages and rise with autonomy and scope. At Stage 1, verbs such as manages, coordinates, prepares, produces, identifies, and contributes describe competent practice under broad direction. At Stage 2, verbs such as designs, implements, leads, develops, governs, and conducts describe management responsibility for a team or department. At Stage 3, verbs such as owns, drives, champions, engages, and mentors describe functional leadership exercised with substantial autonomy. At Stage 4, verbs such as sets, shapes, directs, builds, and advises describe enterprise-level strategic leadership. Assessors, employers, and Professional Members should apply the same ladder when judging evidence against the matrix. The matrix describes competence, not tenure or title: a practitioner is placed at the Stage whose descriptors their demonstrated practice meets across the domains, whatever their job title or years in role.

Table 5. Progression Matrix: Stage 1 Practitioner and Stage 2 Professional

Table 6. Progression Matrix: Stage 3 Strategic Professional and Stage 4 Strategic Leader

PART D: PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS

8. The IAM Code of Ethics

All IAM Professional Members, Affiliates, Student Members, and Honorary Fellows are bound by the IAM Code of Ethics (IAM-COE-2026-001). The nine Professional Values set out in Section 3.2 of this document, expressed as nine binding Principles in the Code of Ethics, define the ethical foundation of professional practice. This section addresses the specific ethical challenges that arise in administrative management and the obligation to maintain professional competence.

8.1 Ethical Decision-Making in Administrative Management

Professionals must address ethical dilemmas by applying the IAM’s nine Professional Values with discipline. The areas encountered most often are:

• Confidentiality: Professionals in gatekeeping roles may have access to sensitive information and must exercise judgement about what may be disclosed, to whom, and when.

• Conflicts of interest: Personal relationships, loyalties, or career pressures may influence professional judgement. Professionals should stay alert to this risk and act to mitigate any conflict that arises.

• Responsible use of AI: Professionals are responsible for ensuring transparency in the use of AI and for maintaining appropriate human oversight of automated outputs.

In all such situations, the IAM expects its Professional Members to act in accordance with the nine Professional Values and the Principles of the Code of Ethics, to seek guidance from the Code, and to exercise professional judgement. Where a member faces an ethical dilemma that cannot be resolved through these means, they should seek advice from the IAM at conduct@instam.org or from an appropriate professional adviser.

A structured approach helps when the right course of action is not obvious. The Institute recommends five steps. First, identify and define the issue: who is affected, which Values or Principles are in tension, and whether the matter is one of operational preference or of compliance and risk. Second, analyse the position and consult: consider the Code, organisational policy, and the law that applies, and where needed take advice from the IAM at conduct@instam.org or from a professional adviser. Third, evaluate the options against the public interest, organisational integrity, and the longer-term consequences of each course of action. Fourth, act on the ethical option and keep a record of the decision, the communications, and the reasons for it, escalating any unresolved concern through the channels described in the Code. Fifth, reflect on the outcome and improve the procedures or controls that allowed the dilemma to arise, so that it is less likely to recur.

Scenario in practice

Situation. An executive asks you to email sensitive customer records to an unverified private address, bypassing the organisation’s secure transfer procedure.

Ethical response. The request conflicts with the Principle of Confidentiality and with the data protection law that applies to your organisation. Decline the insecure route in writing, citing the information security policy, and provide an approved encrypted method of transfer instead; keep a record of the exchange. Afterwards, review the case with those responsible for information security and propose controls that block insecure attachments, so that the dilemma is less likely to recur.

8.2 The Obligation to Maintain Competence

Professional competence must be maintained throughout a career; these Standards treat it as a continuing obligation. The IAM requires all Professional Members from Associate grade upwards to undertake 30 hours of CPD per year, uniform across all four assessed grades: Associate, Member, Fellow, and Senior Fellow. The annual requirement is deliberately the same at every grade: the Institute reflects seniority not in additional hours but in the nature, complexity, and mandatory composition of the CPD undertaken, which are expected to deepen with Career Stage. Full provisions, including the mandatory minima for Structured CPD, Ethics CPD, and Sustainability CPD that apply uniformly across all four assessed grades, are set out in the IAM CPD Regulation (IAM-CPD-REG-2026-001), with practical guidance in the IAM CPD Guidance for Individuals (IAM-CPD-IND-2026-001).

8.3 Post-Nominal Usage

Post-nominals (SFInstAM, FInstAM, MInstAM, AInstAM) may be used only while Professional Membership is current and in Good Standing.

Professional Members who held Senior Fellow (SFInstAM), Fellow (FInstAM), or Member (MInstAM) grade at the time of their transition to retired status under the IAM Membership Regulation may continue to use their post-nominals with the addition of the (Rtd) suffix, for example, SFInstAM (Rtd), FInstAM (Rtd), or MInstAM (Rtd). Retired Professional Members are not required to maintain CPD but remain bound by the IAM Code of Ethics. Full provisions governing retired Professional Membership are set out in the IAM Membership Regulation (IAM-MEM-REG-2026-001).

Student Members are individuals who have provided evidence of current enrolment in a recognised programme of study. Student Members are not eligible for post-nominals but may use the descriptive title “Student Member”. Affiliates are not eligible for post-nominals but may use the descriptive title “IAM Affiliate”. Subscribers are not members of the profession and may not use any IAM designation.

The honorary designation HonFInstAM is conferred by Board resolution under separate provision in the IAM Membership Regulation. Honorary Fellow holders are recognised by the Institute and may use the post-nominal HonFInstAM, but are not admitted through the assessed framework, are not subject to mandatory CPD, and remain bound by the IAM Code of Ethics. Honorary Fellow status is held for life unless rescinded by the Board in accordance with the IAM Membership Regulation.

PART E: APPLYING THE STANDARDS

9. Self-Assessment and Professional Development Planning

The Professional Standards are designed to be used as a practical tool for self-assessment. Professional Members are encouraged to review their competence against the Progression Matrix (Section 7) at least once a year. Members first identify their current Career Stage against the stage descriptions in Section 6, then review each of the seven Competency Domains and assess their current competence honestly. They compare that self-assessment with the Progression Matrix cell for their Career Stage in each domain, choose two or three priority areas for development, and build a CPD plan around those priorities.

The IAM Membership Platform provides digital tools to support self-assessment, CPD planning, and CPD recording. Details of the tools available, and guidance on their use, are published on the IAM website.

10. CPD and the Professional Standards

10.1 The CPD Framework

All IAM Professional Members from Associate grade upwards are required to complete 30 hours of CPD per year, uniform across all four assessed grades (Associate, Member, Fellow, and Senior Fellow), as specified in the IAM CPD Regulation (IAM-CPD-REG-2026-001). Within the annual total, mandatory minima apply to Structured CPD (50 per cent, that is 15 hours), Ethics CPD (3 hours), and Sustainability CPD (2 hours, rising to 3 hours from 1 January 2028). The remaining hours may comprise self-directed activities such as professional reading, reflective practice, mentoring, and on-the-job learning. The first CPD Year under the CPD Regulation commences on 1 January 2027.

Full CPD requirements, recording obligations, audit provisions, and guidance on eligible activities are set out in the IAM CPD Regulation and the IAM CPD Guidance for Individuals (IAM-CPD-IND-2026-001).

10.2 Aligning CPD to the Competency Domains

Professional Members should distribute their CPD across the seven Competency Domains in a way that reflects their development needs, not only their existing strengths. The Institute asks members to make that link at two points in the year rather than activity by activity: when planning, by identifying the two or three domains that are the priority for the coming year (Section 9); and at the year end, by confirming in the annual CPD summary which domains their development has covered. Learning delivered or endorsed by the IAM is mapped to the Competency Domains by the provider, so no separate step is needed from the member. Recording requirements are set out in Regulation 7 of the IAM CPD Regulation.

11. For Employers

Employers can use the Professional Standards to strengthen the quality of administrative management across their organisations. The Competency Domains provide a framework for designing job descriptions and person specifications that reflect the knowledge, skills, and behaviours expected at each Career Stage. The Progression Matrix can be used to benchmark existing roles and identify capability gaps, to structure performance management and appraisal conversations, to design targeted development plans for administrative teams, and to support workforce planning. The relative weight given to each Competency Domain will vary with sector, organisational size, and operating context, and the Standards are designed to be tailored in that way; what does not vary is the competence expected at each Career Stage. Employers may verify any IAM membership, grade, or post-nominal, and a Professional Member’s Good Standing, directly with the Institute; details are published on the IAM website.

Employers seeking to adopt the Standards across their administrative function may contact the IAM through www.instam.org.

12. For Educators and Centre Partners

Educators and centre partners who design and deliver administrative management qualifications or courses should use the Professional Standards as the primary reference for course content, learning outcomes, and assessment criteria. The Competency Domains define the subject matter of the profession; the Career Stages define the competence expected at each stage. Providers seeking IAM recognition of a qualification or course against these Standards should refer to the IAM Qualifications and Courses Endorsement Scheme (IAM-QCE-2026-001). IAM Certified Programmes are designed against these Standards and are delivered both by the Institute directly and by IAM Recognised Training Centres, with every assessment set and moderated, and every credential issued, by the Institute; the IAM Certified Programmes Handbook (IAM-CPH-2026-001) sets out the curriculum design methodology, assessment framework, and quality assurance requirements that govern them. The IAM regulates its Certified Programmes internally because the Standards are designed for international application: external qualifications regulation is national by nature, and a single internal framework keeps the Programmes consistent for members in every jurisdiction. The Institute separates delivery from awarding as a matter of principle: a Centre may teach, but every assessment is set and moderated, and every outcome determined, by the Institute, so that the credential means the same thing wherever it was earned.

PART F: GOVERNANCE AND REVIEW

13. Development and Governance of the Standards

13.1 How the Standards Were Developed

The IAM Professional Standards for Administrative Management were developed through research, consultation, and expert review. The Institute’s authority to set professional standards rests on an institutional history that begins in 1915, when Lawrence R. Dicksee, a chartered accountant who taught accounting and business methods at the London School of Economics, founded the Office Machinery Users’ Association in London as a forum in which those responsible for office systems and equipment could exchange experience and establish good practice. As the work of the office widened, so did the Institute: it became the Office Management Association in 1935, the Institute of Office Management in 1960, and the Institute of Administrative Management in 1972. That founding purpose carries into the present. These Standards, together with the IAM Code of Ethics, the IAM Membership Regulation, and the IAM CPD Regulation, form the Institute’s modern professional framework, supported by the digital services through which members plan, record, and evidence their development.

The development of these Standards drew on the IAM’s existing competency framework, the professional practice of IAM Professional Members internationally, the published professional standards of comparable professional bodies internationally, academic research, and the expertise of the IAM Professional Standards Committee and the Academic Board.

13.2 The IAM Professional Standards Committee

The IAM Professional Standards Committee is responsible for the development, maintenance, and periodic review of the Professional Standards. The Committee reports to the IAM Academic Board and comprises members drawn from across the IAM’s Professional Membership.

13.3 Review Cycle

The Professional Standards are subject to a two-year formal review cycle. The next scheduled review shall conclude by 1 December 2028, so that any revised edition can take effect on 1 January 2029, aligned with the CPD Year. Between formal reviews, minor corrections and clarifications may be issued as errata. Any substantive changes require approval by the IAM Professional Standards Committee and endorsement by the Academic Board.

Professional Members, employers, educators, and other stakeholders are invited to submit feedback, corrections, and suggestions at any time to enquiry@instam.org or through the IAM website at www.instam.org; confirmed errors are corrected through the errata process described above.

14. Related Documents

The following IAM governance and framework documents support and inform these Standards and should be read in conjunction with them. Some are cited directly in the text; others form the wider governance framework within which the Standards operate. The full IAM document family, including supplementary guidance and policy documents, is published separately on the IAM website.

Table 7. IAM governance and framework documents supporting these Standards

All related documents are available to IAM Professional Members through the IAM Membership Platform. Enquiries about access should be directed to the IAM at www.instam.org.

Annex A (informative): Competence at Each Career Stage

This annex describes what competence looks like in each Competency Domain at each assessed Career Stage, expressed in terms of the responsibility a practitioner holds and the work they can be shown to have done. It is informative and serves three purposes.

First, it supports self-assessment and development planning under Section 9, by giving a practitioner a fuller picture than a single Progression Matrix cell of what the next Stage would require of them.

Second, it supports employers under Section 11 in writing job descriptions, framing appraisal conversations, and describing an administrative role accurately.

Third, it indicates what a statement of a candidate’s professional experience should establish. Where an applicant for Professional Membership supplies a description of their role and responsibilities, whether from an employer or in their own account of their work, this annex indicates the substance that description should address at the Stage claimed: the scope of the role, what the person was accountable for, and the decisions they took.

This annex is informative only. It does not add to or vary the evidence requirements for admission, which are set out in Regulation 3 of the IAM Membership Regulation (IAM-MEM-REG-2026-001) and govern. Where a candidate supplies documents of their own, those documents should be anonymised or redacted if they contain personal data or commercially sensitive information, and members remain bound by the confidentiality obligations of the Code of Ethics.

The Stages are cumulative. Competence described at an earlier Stage is assumed and carried forward at every later Stage. Affiliate tier is not assessed against the Career Stages; the standards expected at that tier are described at Section 6.2.

Table 8. Competence by Competency Domain: Stage 1 Practitioner and Stage 2 Professional

Table 9. Competence by Competency Domain: Stage 3 Strategic Professional and Stage 4 Strategic Leader

Annex B (informative): Related International Standards and Frameworks

The Standards are principle-based and do not require conformity with, or certification against, any external standard. For members and organisations who wish to align their practice with recognised international references, this annex lists the standards and frameworks most relevant to each Competency Domain. References are undated: the current edition of each, including any amendments, applies. Listing a standard here places no requirement on any member or organisation to obtain certification against it, and the list is not exhaustive. In designing its own assessment and recognition processes the Institute has regard to the internationally recognised requirements for bodies that certify the competence of persons, in particular the principles of impartiality, the separation of training from assessment, and the use of defined competence criteria.

Table 10. Related international standards and frameworks by Competency Domain

Issued for consultation by the IAM Professional Standards Committee

Exposure Draft for consultation · Institute of Administrative Management, 11 September 2026 · Proposed to take effect from 1 January 2027

Non Sibi Sed Toti: Not for Oneself but for All

www.instam.org

© 2026 Institute of Administrative Management. All rights reserved.

INSTITUTE OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT

Inspiring professionals since 1915

IAM Professional Standards for Administrative Management

IAM-PS-2026-001 • Edition 1.0 • Exposure Draft • 11 September 2026

Non Sibi Sed Toti

Not for Oneself but for All

www.instam.org • enquiry@instam.org

© 2026 Institute of Administrative Management. All rights reserved.

A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales, No. 09016031.